How Med Honors Selects Honorees
An independent editorial process grounded in peer nominations, publicly available professional information, and editorial judgment. Med Honors designations recognize professional achievement and public standing, not clinical competency or patient outcomes.
The Five-Stage Selection Process
Six Areas of Editorial Review
Professional Achievement
Career accomplishments, specialty experience, and publicly recognized contributions to the medical field.
Licensure & Credentials
Active medical licensure and board certification status as stated in the public record.
Peer Recognition
Standing and endorsement from fellow physicians, institutions, and professional organizations as reflected in nominations and public sources.
Patient Advocacy
Publicly documented commitment to patient access, health education, and community engagement.
Professional Standing
Review of available disciplinary, licensing, and public-record information consistent with our editorial standards.
Innovation & Impact
Contributions to research, treatment advancement, healthcare access, or public health as reflected in publicly available information.
How We Handle Credentials
Where credentials are relevant, Med Honors relies on available public records and submitted materials. Board certification, specialty training, fellowship, accreditation, and professional memberships are treated as distinct credentials and attributed as specifically as the available record supports.
When submitted information differs from available public records, our editorial team reviews the discrepancy before publication. The goal is accurate attribution without overstating what the available record establishes.
The Expert Honors Research Platform
Med Honors uses the Expert Honors platform as a research aid, aggregating publicly available professional information and peer nomination data at scale. It assists our research process; all decisions are made under the published criteria. The platform does not assess clinical outcomes or medical competency.
About Our Process
How does the Med Honors selection process work?
Our research team identifies candidates through peer nominations, publicly available professional information, and submitted materials. All candidates are assessed by our editorial team using category-specific criteria. Selection is an editorial designation, not a clinical verification or patient-safety certification.
Can I nominate a physician?
Yes. Peer nominations from colleagues, patients, or administrators are a valued part of our process. Self-nominations are also accepted and evaluated using the same criteria.
How long does the selection process take?
Our research cycles operate year-round. Candidates can expect an update within 4–8 weeks of our review window opening.
How is Med Honors different from other awards?
Med Honors uses a research-driven editorial process under published criteria. Our designations reflect editorial assessment, not clinical credentialing or regulatory certification.
What disqualifies a candidate?
Active licensing proceedings, professional disciplinary records, or conduct clearly inconsistent with Med Honors editorial standards may result in non-selection. Med Honors reserves the right to decline any nomination for any reason.
Can a recognition be revoked?
Yes. Med Honors reserves the right to revoke a designation if disqualifying information comes to light after selection.
Know Someone Who Deserves Recognition?
Submit a nomination and our research team will evaluate the candidate.
Find Recognized Medical Professionals
Browse editorially recognized physicians, surgeons, and specialists across all 50 states. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider independently.